Special Counsel for detained leader of the indigenous People of Biafra (IPOB), Nnamdi Kanu, Aloy Ejimakor, has accused President Bola Tinubu, Attorney General of the Federation and Minister of Justice (AGF), Lateef Fagbemi (SAN) and the Federal High Court, of violating the orders of the Supreme Court of Nigeria by failing to obey an order mandating that his client should be granted bail.

In a statement he shared on X on Thursday, Ejimakor alleged that the fundamental rights of the IPOB leader has been breached as a result of the refusal to obey the court orders.

He noted that the President, the AGF and the Federal High Court’s failure to restore Kanu’s revoked bail as ordered by the Supreme Court in 2023 is a blatant violation of the order of the apex court, 1999 Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria and international laws.

Ejimakor stated that in December 2023, the Supreme Court gave a ruling that it was wrong to have revoked Kanu’s bail, which, according to him, meant his bail should, without delay, be restored by virtue of Section 287(1) of the Constitution, however, he said the orders were blatantly flouted.

Quoting Section 287(1) of the 1999 Constitution, Ejimakor said the decisions of the Supreme Court should have been enforced in any part of the Federation by all authorities and persons, and by courts with subordinate jurisdiction to that of the Supreme Court.

In the statement titled ‘Mazi Nnamdi Kanu: What the public may not know’, the lawyer said:

“In December 2023, the Supreme Court held that it was wrong to have revoked Mazi Nnamdi Kanu’s bail, meaning that his bail should, without more, be restored by virtue of Section 287(1) of the Constitution which states that:

“The decisions of the Supreme Court shall be enforced in any part of the Federation by all authorities and persons, and by courts with subordinate jurisdiction to that of the Supreme Court.”

“The operative part in these provisions lies in the phrase that says “by all authorities and persons, and by the courts.

“It follows therefore that since the Federal High Court refused to enforce the decision of the Supreme Court by its inexplicable failure to restore Mazi Nnamdi Kanu’s bail, the Federal Government which is an “authority” or President Tinubu or AGF Fagbemi (who are “persons”) can step in and restore Mazi Nnamdi Kanu’s bail. And they are bound to do so without more because, by the clear provisions of the Constitution, they do not need any further Court order.

“In other words, it does not lie with the Courts alone to enforce the decisions of the Supreme Court. The President or the Attorney-General can also concurrently exercise the same power.

“To be sure, their collective refusal to act has unwittingly turned Mazi Nnamdi Kanu to a victim of false or unlawful imprisonment by the Nigerian State.

“This is where Britain comes in because Mazi Nnamdi Kanu is also its citizen and under British law and pertinent international law binding Nigeria and Britain, no British citizen should be detained illegally by any country regardless of dual nationality.

‘So, the question to ask is this: Is it lawful or constitutional for the President and the Attorney-General (who breached the Constitution by refusing to enforce the decision of the Supreme Court) to turn around and insist on subjecting Mazi Nnamdi Kanu to trial before a Federal High Court that also violated the Constitution by refusing to enforce the same decision of the Supreme Court?

“The answer is obvious and that is: It is a blatant violation of Section 287(1) of the Constitution. It is unlawful. It is perverse. It also offends the basic canons of equity and good conscience and it is immoral to boot.

“Equity requires all to have clean hands. The trial of Mazi Nnamdi Kanu no longer bears any clean hands because the authorities (the President and the AGF) that prosecute him and the Federal High Court that designs to try him brazenly dishonored the Supreme Court and the Constitution by refusing to restore his bail.

“And this: How can you subject a man to the rigors and travails of prosecution and trial under a Constitution you flagrantly violated in its black letters and spirit? Is Nigeria under a rule of law or a rule (of) impunity, whims and caprices? This is the crux of the matter.”